The phosphorus cycle may not be the
first nutrient cycle we learn about when the content is first introduced to us
in middle-school science class, but it is becoming more and more relevant in
our lives. Phosphorus moves through the air, soil, and water; it is eroded out
of rocks and released into the atmosphere by factories. Perhaps one of the
biggest issues caused by phosphorus is runoff
from fertilizer used on farms, which is not healthy if it gets in our water supply. However, this problem in the phosphorus
cycle has a potential solution: another stage of the phosphorus cycle! Plants
absorb phosphorus form the soil and use it to grow, so why can’t we use this as
a natural way to get rid of phosphorus we don’t want just rolling around out
there. Further, what kinds of plants can help with this and
what kind of plants don’t really need that much phosphorus at all?
Depiction of the Phosphorus cycle. Could C3 plants be more effective at taking up Phosphorus? Retrieved from http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/ |
I
looked at an article by Halsted and Lynch that focused on how plants respond to
different levels phosphorus in the soil; in particular, comparing the plants of
the C3 and C4 photosystems. The authors grew a number of different species -
including C3 and C4 plants as well as monocots and dicots – and grew them in a
sand/alumina medium at varying phosphorus treatment levels from stable to phosphorus stress (low levels). They measured each plant’s height, stem
width, and carbon dioxide exchange rate (CER), as well as number of branches (for
dicots only) and height of highest tiller (for monocots).
As we
would expect, all species grew less under phosphorus stress. However, it turns
out that C4 plants’ CER was less effected in situations with low phosphorus,
meaning that they are not as reliant on phosphorus availability in soil as C3. This
could mean that C3 plants have to take up more phosphorus out of the soil to
survive.
So how
can we use this research for our own good? Well, conservation societies have
already started working on a solution known as “buffer strips”. These patches
of land filled with native plant species are positioned along rivers between
main farming sites to absorb the phosphorus before it gets into the water
supply. Thanks to the Halsted and Lynch paper, we now know that C3 plants are
more phosphorus dependent. This could spark further research to see if C3
plants can actually make buffer strips more effective by absorbing more
phosphorus. Research like this can help protect our water supply from dangerous
algal blooms; thus, keeping water potable and protecting native fish populations.
It can give us good, clean water. And it is a solution we need because we
need agriculture, but we need water more.
References:
Halsted, M. and J. Lynch. 1995. Phosphorus responses of C3 and C4 species. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 497-505.
No comments:
Post a Comment