The tallgrass prairie ecosystem is one of the most
threatened in North America. Once covering 70-80% of Iowa, it now covers less
than 1/10 of a percent.
The remaining fragments are scattered throughout Iowa, often highly degraded
and on marginal land. European agriculture and its affiliated machinery have
caused much of this transformation. However, individuals, local and state
organizations are pushing to restore the prairie through new plantings. The
success of these efforts depends on overcoming several obstacles, namely
invasion from Eurasian agricultural and ornamental species.
How can invasive plants hurt the establishment of natives?
Priority effects holds the answer to this question. A priority effect is the
impact of an early arriving species on later community development by
constraining which later arriving species can coexist. For example, if species
A had a stronger priority effect than species B, species A would more greatly
influence what other species could or could not colonize that same space. Research
summarized by Wilsey et al 2014 has pointed to a stronger priority effects in
exotic, Eurasian species compared to native, tallgrass prairie species. This
predicts that Eurasian species will influence later community development than
tallgrass prairie species.
A 2014 paper published in New Phytologist by Wilsey
et al addressed why priority effects may be stronger in exotic rather than
native species. They predicted that the difference in priority effects was due
to differences in regenerative traits, or traits related to early development.
Wilsey et al hypothesized that priority effect differences
were due to either (1) native and exotic species differing in these regenerative
traits or (2) native species differing from cultivated
exotic genotypes, but not from wild
exotic genotypes (Figure 1). To test these hypotheses, the researchers created
14 matched sets of species, each set containing a native, a wild exotic and a
cultivated exotic species (total 42 species). These species shared the same
taxonomic family if not tribe and had similar ecological functions (life history,
photosynthesis mechanism), spanning the 4 main functional groups of the
tallgrass prairie. Additionally, all the exotic species are listed on either
national or local invasive species list.
Figure 1: Illustrated hypothesis of Wilsey et al 2014
(created by Wilsey et al 2014). The x-axis is a combination of regeneration
measures with the curves showing the distributions of the native North American
individuals with the exotic Eurasian individuals. They had found no evidence of
(a). Therefore, that hypothesis was not investigated in their paper.
Their design was an additive competition greenhouse experiment.
In separate pots, each of the ‘early arriving’ species (the matched 42) were
seeded. These seedlings were allowed to grow for 21 days and then a mix of 39
different native species was added as the ‘late arrivals’. 11 pots were started
as controls, seeded only with the late arrivals so the researchers could detect
how much the early arriving species influenced the growth of the late arriving
species. They harvested the plants at the end of the growing season (May 10-September
13) and analyzed diversity, species richness and late arrival biomass (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Illustrated additive comparative design. Each row
corresponds to a different early arrival. Each column represents a different
time point. Notable findings captioned below.
Since the researchers were interested in regenerative
traits, they measured timing of emergence, emergence rate, seedling biomass,
canopy light capture, and seedling height of the early arrivals. At harvest,
they measured the total aboveground biomass of late arrivals, species
diversity, and species richness. These measurements described how the community
assembled given which species arrived early and were used to estimate the
priority effects of each early arrival group (native, wild exotic, cultivated
exotic).
The regenerative traits differed significantly between
exotic genotypes and native species, but not between wild and cultivated exotic
species. Exotic seedlings were larger, emerged earlier and captured more sunlight.
Cultivated exotic genotypes had larger biomass than wild exotic than native,
but this difference was found to be a small factor in the overall priority
effects. Furthermore, these different measures were highly correlated, meaning
that if a species was likely to emerge early, they often captured more sunlight
and vice versa.
The researchers found much lower diversity at the end of the
season in the wild and cultivated exotic pots than in the native pots, often
creating monocultures. Because diversity and richness were higher in native
treatments compared to exotic treatments, natives were classified as having
smaller priority effects. However the most interesting finding was the strong
correlation between regeneration traits and community measures. Using principle
component analysis, regeneration traits were strong predictors of later
establishment diversity and richness. In fact, these traits fully accounted for
the variability in diversity, but not total late arriving biomass. In sum, the
researchers found evidence supporting hypothesis 1 but none to support
hypothesis 2.
This has serious implications since previous research has
shown that exotics reduce native abundance not through competition with adult
plants but in reducing the establishment of native seedlings. In terms of
management practices, these findings suggest focus on establishing natives
early before exotics can be fully established. This will prove challenging
since approximately 25% of all the species within the Iowa flora are classified
as non-native. Additionally
other studies mentioned by Wilsey et al (2014) have shown that the impact of
priority effects can last for several years, meaning longer time scales for
restoration efforts.
But all is not lost. Work by Carter
and Blair 2012 has demonstrated that if a representative mix of tallgrass
prairie species are used to seed restorations, given time, they can approach
similar diversity as remnant prairies. Furthermore, these results are of a
greenhouse experiment, meaning that resources are plentiful and weather benign,
which rarely happens in the field. The next step for this research is to take
the experiment out into the field to see if differences in weather cues and
predator activity may alter these outcomes.
Carter, Daniel L. Blair, John M. 2012. Recovery of Native
Plant Community Characteristics on a Chronosequence of Restored Prairies Seeded
into Pastures in West-Central Iowa. Restoration
Ecology 1-10
Wilsey, Brian J. Barber, Kaitlin. Martin, Leanne M. 2014.
Exotic grassland species have stronger priority effects than natives regardless
of whether they are cultivated or wild genotypes. New Phytologist 1-10
No comments:
Post a Comment