From song lyrics to film titles, the term concrete jungle is often used
ironically to refer to urban areas filled with buildings and sidewalks rather
than trees or other plants. However, given the many plants to be found in urban
landscapes, it is clear that the two are not mutually exclusive. The
relationship between urban environments of concrete and steel and the species of
plants that continue to grow in them is the subject of plenty of research by
urban ecologists. Many people expect that the diversity of plant species and
the well-being of the plants themselves would decrease as environments develop
from wild forests to towns and cities, but research suggests that those
assumptions don’t capture the complexity of plants’
abilities to occupy urban landscapes.
The paper Plant species response to
urbanization: comparison of isolated woodland patches in two cities of
North-Western France explores the relationship between plants and their
urban and rural environments in depth, and also connects to research I’ve done
on Grinnell’s campus examining the effect of pavement on which plant species
occur in a courtyard in the Noyce Sciencec Building.
The aforementioned
paper by Vallet et al. built off of previous research showing that urban environments
tend to be home to more non-indigenous species and plants adapted to high
levels of disturbance. The researchers in Vallet worked in 22 sites across two cities in France, all of which were then characterized along an urban to rural gradient. The classification of each site
is shown in Fig. 1. Scientists measured each site for species abundance, as well as measurements of light,
moisture, soil pH, and soil nitrogen content. The researchers found a marked
difference in plant composition across proportion of sites with impervious surfaces
(i.e. concrete); namely three non-native species and seven native species were
associated with larger cover of impervious surfaces. Vallet et al. mentioned research
by other teams showing that concrete can increase nitrogen content and affect
pH, causing some plants to perform quite well when growing near concrete. They
concluded that some plant species, both native and non-native, are able to
withstand changes to their environment due to urbanization, and many urban
plants thrive in the conditions caused by abundant concrete.
These findings also
have applications to a much smaller concrete jungle: the courtyard near the
elbow of the Noyce Science Center in Grinnell (Fig. 2). The courtyard serves as
a study space in the science building, and many plants were introduced to
populate the garden spaces, but some species colonized the pavement cracks on
their own. We surveyed the cracks to see if the presence and abundance of
certain plant species are affected by the width of the sidewalk cracks (a
measure of both permeability and soil space). The research by Vallet et al.
shows that we shouldn’t be looking at the concrete in the courtyard purely as
an obstacle to plant growth; some species thrive better near concrete than in rural
environments. Although the analysis of native and introduced species is not as
applicable to our research, since many of the plants in the cracks of the
sidewalk are descendants of the ornamental plants in the courtyard, and
although our research space is of a much smaller scale, their findings on the
effects of concrete still have implications for us. Concrete jungles
exist all around us, and the plants that live there are often doing just fine.
Figure 2. We took to the Noyce Courtyard to measure the species abundance and width of sidewalk cracks
Vallet, J., H.
Daniel, V. Beaujouan, F. Roze. 2008. Plant species response to urbanization:
comparison of isolated woodland patches in two cities of North-Western France. Landscape Ecology 23:1205-1217.
No comments:
Post a Comment