Saturday, December 10, 2016

Citizen Scientists Help Us Understand Plant Diseases

          When trying to elucidate infectious disease dynamics, it is necessary understand spatial and temporal patterns of the species being infected as well as the species that is infectious. When studying plant infectious disease, this means that it is necessary to have robust and up to date data on where the plant is located, and geographically where the plants are being infected. If the disease has a broad range, then the task of gathering up-to-date, robust data is extremely difficult for scientists on their own. Additionally, most data collected by scientists comes from plants on public lands, which leaves a gap in understanding plant diseases on private lands.  
            Meentemeyer et al. recognized citizen science projects as a means to increase data sets and improve knowledge of Sudden Oak Death (SOD), a disease caused by Phytophthora ramorum. In 2008, Meentemeyer et al. founded Sudden Oak Death Blitz, a community science program in California that trains community members to collect leaf samples from oak trees infected with SOD. Each volunteer is able to send in 16 leaf samples, and the location of each sample site is tracked through GPS within a mobile application. Figure one shows the data available for geographic distribution of SOD before and after SOD Blitz. The presence or absence of P. ramorum is verified in a laboratory through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and ribosomal DNA sequencing. From 2008 to 2013, SOD Blitz had over 1,600 community science volunteers. Prior to the program, they were able to predict P. ramorum infections with 65% accuracy (2008). In 2013, after five years of the program, they were able to predict with 78% accuracy. Additionally, for each year of the program, community science volunteers have had an equal or higher ratio of infected leaves: non infected leaves than self-reported expert volunteers. This indicates that with some training, community scientists can collect samples as effectively as self-reported experts.
Figure 1: On the left are SOD sampling sites pre-SOD Blitz program. On the right are SOD sampling sites five years into the program (2013). Red dots represent infected samples, while green squares represent uninfected samples. 

            The success of SOD Blitz suggests that similar community monitoring programs could be useful in helping scientists understand other plant diseases. One potential opportunity would be to implement a similar program to study bur oak blight (BOB) in the Midwest. BOB is leaf spot disease caused by fungus, Tubakia iowensis which occurs primarily in Iowa and Minnesota (figure 2). Harrington et al. have suggested that the recent increase in BOB may be related to the increase in spring rains in the Midwest. With climate change, it is predicted that Iowa will have increased spring rainfall, so it would be interesting to further investigate the connection between rainfall and BOB disease progression.  Harrington et al. have performed some observations on BOB’s distribution (figure 2), but a community science monitoring program would help expand the data set and monitor disease progression over time in an efficient manner. By creating a long-term program similar to SOD Blitz, we would be able to better understand the dynamics of T. iowensis infections in bur oaks. Additionally, a community science approach could help to engage the public in the process of science and instill an appreciation for the envrionment. 
Figure 2: Geographic distribution of T. iowensisRed represents counties where T. iowensis presence has been confirmed. Gray represents counties where T. iowensis has not been found as of July 2016.

References:

Meentemeyer, R.K.; Dorning, M.A.; Vogler, J.B.; Schmidt, D.; and Garbelotto, M. 2015. Citizen Science Helps Predict Risk of Emerging Infectious Disease. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 13: 189–194.

8 comments:

  1. How serious are these diseases, in terms of tree morbidity and mortality?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With BOB, symptoms tend to get worse from year to year, and the tree can die after multiple years of severe infections. Bur oaks are deferentially affected by T. iowensis, as a result of highland vs upland location and genetic variance. With BOB, fungicide injection treatments applied in May or June have shown promise in bur oaks. Both of the tree infections are relatively recent, so they are still trying to determine exact probabilities of tree death. http://www.suddenoakdeath.org/about-sudden-oak-death/faq/#chances http://www.ipm.iastate.edu/ipm/info/plant-diseases/bur-oak-blight

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. By recruiting citizen scientists, you may also be able to include more private land in your study area, particularly if you can encourage landowners to collect samples of infected trees on their own land. This may be especially helpful in Iowa, which is second to only Kansas in percent private land (from a few years ago)

    ReplyDelete
  4. This seems like such a great community based project! I can definitely see local schools and landowners getting involved with this effort. And excellent job with finding an issue that “hits close to home”.

    I was wondering what’s the time frame for disease expression? Are symptoms noticeable all year long or intensified during summer/ spring?

    In addition, suppose you detect infected trees within the first year of your project, are you planning on incorporating fungicide applications/ remedies to those identified trees? Is there a “treatment” component to your project? Considering the infection gets worse each year, do you think it would be worthwhile and practical to combat the disease once you found infected individuals?

    Your project will assist in providing insight on BOB progression but I’m curious to know if you would also want to monitor disease “regression” in treated trees?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Infected trees typically lose their leaves in late July-Early August. The symptoms are most obvious through the blighted leaves, but the fungus can overwinter in the leaf petioles (attached to tree). Therefore, leaf collection is not an effective action to mitigate BOB.

    I am considering adding an experimental treatment section to my proposal. I have not been able to find data in the literature on BOB response to fungicide. There are some websites, such as Tree Geek, which say 2/3 of bur oaks respond to the treatment. However, the same site is also trying to sell the treatment and they do not provide any external reference for their statistic. If I do add this experimental section, I would want to measure disease regression as well.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This sounds like an engaging and important project! I am also wondering what the next step would be. What is the usual response when the oaks get this fungus?

    When I was in Minnesota, the Bureau of Land Management cut down many diseased trees so to avoid spread. I can see how this would be a problem if citizens felt like they were giving a death sentence to every tree they identified.

    Also, how do you hope to collect rainfall information? Are you thinking of looking up average rainfall in each area or are you putting out weather stations?

    ReplyDelete