Vishva Nalamalapu
When an exotic organism is
introduced to an environment, it is not guaranteed success. What, then,
determines whether or not it will succeed? To answer this question, research is
needed that compares exotics that are invasive (species that are widespread and
dominant) and those that are non-invasive (isolated species with low abundances). Lake
and Leishman did just that (2004).
Lake and Leishman compared specific
traits in invasive exotic, non-invasive exotic, and native species in order to
understand which traits promote exotic species success, and whether those traits
change with disturbance type. One of the traits was specific leaf area, which
they expected to be greater in invasives because it
is an indicator of relative growth rate, and exotics need higher growth rates
in order to succeed. They also expected exotics to have more glabrous, soft
leaves because exotics
experience less herbivory (herbivores are not adapted to prey on exotics
when they are first introduced) and, consequently, do not need to allocate as
much to defense. Lake and Leishman expected invasives to have less seed mass because there
is a tradeoff between seed mass and number, and exotics are more successful
if they have more seeds to maximize their colonization potential. Lastly, they
expected invasives to have herb, grass, climber, and vine growth forms and
lower canopies because exotics are more
successful if they grow more quickly.
How They Did It
To test these hypotheses, Lake and
Leishman sampled 400m2 of vegetation in three types of urban
bushland in Sydney, Australia. Sites where there was stormwater runoff
were considered water and nutrient disturbed, riparian sites next to creeks receiving
urban runoff were considered nutrient disturbed, and sites with disturbance
from clearing, vehicles, and/or trampling were considered physically disturbed.
What They Found
Lake and Leishman found exotics
only where there was nutrient enrichment, and they found only one exotic
species in physically disturbed areas. They also found that invasives had
higher specific leaf areas and more soft leaves than non-invasives. In
physically disturbed sites, invasives had high colonization abilities (small
seed masses) and short times to maturity (low
canopy heights and herb or grass growth forms). In nutrient enriched sites,
invasives had greater allocations to growth (climbing or vine growth forms) and
long-distance seed dispersals (vertebrate seed dispersal). Therefore, higher
specific leaf areas and more soft leaves are associated with exotic species
success. High colonization ability and short time to maturity are particularly
important in physically disturbed sites, while maximum allocations to growth and
long-distance seed dispersals are particularly important in nutrient enriched
disturbed sites. Thus, traits that promote exotic species success depend on the
sites that the exotic species are invading.
Why It's Important
These findings have significant
implications. To inhibit exotic species success, stormwater runoff should be
stopped from reaching low-nutrient soils and physical disturbance should be
minimized. More generally, ecological restoration cannot attempt to restore
previous communities without first restoring previous environmental conditions
(nutrients, water, disturbance, etc.). In sum, against our human tendency to simplify issues and
disregard their root cause, we must manage the root cause of exotic species
success.
What's Next?
To
further our understanding of physical disturbance and species success, along with a fellow Ecology classmate, I am studying desire paths in Grinnell College's campus. Desire
paths are paths that have been developed and maintained by students repeatedly walking on them (rather than formal paths). We are considering this walking a type of physical disturbance, and
are surveying the dominant
species along the disturbance gradient (at different distances from the paths' centers). With the findings of Lake and Leishman in mind, we expect successful species will have high colonization abilities and short times to maturity. By carrying out this study, we hope to further the findings of Lake and Leishman and to understand which species and, thus, which traits cause species to be successful
in this type of physical disturbance.
References
Lake,
J.C., & Leishman, M.R. (2004). Invasion success of exotic plants in natural
ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant
attributes and freedom from herbivores.
Biological Conservation, 117, 215-226.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am wondering what is the difference between invasive exotic species and non-invasive exotic species. Besdie that, i think the paper actually proposed an interesting points. Because what i have learn in the ecological preservation so far is mainly about increasing disturbances and therefore increase the overall population diversity, i wonder what cause the difference in preservation strategies between natural ecology and urban ecology.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Vishva. I am wondering what implications you think there are for agriculture, given that agricultural fields often have increased nutrient and water applications as well as high levels of disturbance. How could we use this study's findings to shape the way we grow crops and control unwanted plants?
ReplyDeleteI think that this study pairs well with what I am working on as paths that are taken often are eventually paved, as we see with the cement path going through Mac Field which had many "desired paths" and now has one fixed path, which may lead to the introduction of more invasive species. I also think that its interesting to think about how the effect of runoff could be strengthened by the "desired path" as these paths are also often those that make deep pools in paths following intense rainfall. I wonder if this study could be used to show students why it is best for them to take the path most traveled and not one they make for themselves, even though it's somewhat ungrinnellian?
ReplyDelete