Many studies on wildlife populations focused on their
natural histories in pristine settings. However, our landscapes are
increasingly comprised of urban environments characterized by buildings, high
availability of food, water, and energy, and perhaps more importantly more
humans. Naturally, we would expect populations in urban environments to display
a different set of physiology, habitat selection, and behaviors than their
rural counterparts. Thus, it is important to study urban populations
systematically. McCleery & Parker (2011) looked at city squirrels.
Specifically, they investigated the influence of urban environments on fox
squirrel range overlap.
Squirrels are territorial. Studies have shown that squirrels
in the traditional rural settings are hierarchical and characterized by
extensive overlapping of ranges (Koprowski 1996). McCleery & Parker
examined the spatial overlap in squirrel ranges during different seasons. They
considered more overlap as hierarchical behaviors and less overlap to be
territorial behaviors.
The urban part of the study was conducted on the main campus
of Texas A&M University dominated by buildings, pavement, and manicured
exotic greases, while the rural part was on a private ranch of the University
of undisturbed hardwood forest and meadows with no little to no human activity.
Twenty squirrels (10 male, 10 female) from each site were trapped with
wire-cage traps and tagged with radio-telemetry collars. Their seasonal ranges
were recorded and calculated.
The results show a reduced seasonal range overlap by
squirrels on the urban site. The study also found that urban squirrels used
fewer nests in winter and in general fewer tree cavities and shelters. McCleery
and Parker believe that squirrels adjust their behavior to use spaces based on
their environmental conditions. They proposed that range boundaries might be
influenced by buildings and the increased habitat unevenness may help delineate
territories. They think cavities might be a limited resource on urban sites and
maintained for exclusive use, such as pregnant females.
In our campus ecology project, Sharene, Jocelyn, and I will
be examining a slightly different aspect of urban squirrel populations –
preferred nesting locations. We record the tree species where nests are found,
their coordinates, and the position of the nests in the tree. In addition, we
will also be comparing our data to a previous data set also collected by
Grinnell students and see if the preferences of squirrels have changed over
time.
Koprowski, J.L. (1996). Natal philopatry, communal nesting, and kinship in fox squirrels and gray squirrels. J. Mammal.77, 1006–1016.
McCleery, R. A., & Parker, I. D. (2011). Influence of the urban environment on Fox Squirrel Range Overlap. Journal of Zoology, 285(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00835.x
I'm interested to see what your group will learn about squirrel's preferred nesting locations based off of the study you shared. I wonder if trees closer to buildings will have less nests on average due to the buildings influencing range boundaries. I was also wondering, how will your group measure the position of nests in trees in your study?
ReplyDelete