Anthropocentric influences of the
last century has left our natural world in a declining state, with decreased
natural habitats and a resulting decrease in biodiversity. Generally, the scientific
community more heavily focuses on the diversity of vertebrates and plants, with
these species abundance and diversity declines more publicized and accessible
by the general public. However, insect biodiversity may be declining at an even
quicker pace than that of vertebrates and plants, and the lack of public awareness
of this requires a more effective method to quantify the risk this organismal
group is under. Because arthropods can be categorized into a wide range of
trophic levels, or roles within in the food chain, numerous factors determine
arthropod community structure, and defining which variables influence species
composition the most is essential for conservational purposes.
Figure 1. Before this study, the species making up an insect
community were though to be determined mainly by environmental conditions (such
as soil pH, moisture, etc.) and by vegetation structure (map A.) However, this
study brought to light that really only plant species composition has a direct
impact on the insect community. Map B demonstrates that this is because the
environment influences plant species presence/absence, which in turn,
determines vegetation structure. Picture from Shaffers 2008.
Andrè P.Shaffers’ (et al.) ‘Arthropod Assemblages are Best Predicted by Plant Species Composition’ sought to compare local factors to define what best predicted
arthropod species presence, also known as ‘assemblage.’ Specifically, the factors
he studies were plant species composition (what species form the plant
community,) landscape composition, vegetation structure (the way plants grow
vertically,) and environmental conditions. Two years of sampling focused on 47
sites ranging from open grasslands, to hay meadows, to dense tall-herb
grasslands in the Netherlands, concentrating on seven arthropod groups
(spiders, grasshoppers, ground beetles, weevils, plant-hoppers, hoverflies, and
bees.)
Surprisingly, environmental
conditions and vegetation structure played a weak role in predicting arthropod species
occurrence, while plant species composition was a highly influential factor. Before
this study, species presence was thought to be attributable to these weaker
factors, but Shaffers shows instead that it is the species of the plant community
that end up having a direct impact on arthropod assemblage. Intuitively, this
makes sense as specific plant species, products of environmental conditions,
are relied upon by herbivorous arthropod species for food, and thus determine
the herbivorous insect community. As higher trophic level species, such as
predator and parasitic arthropods, prey upon the lower trophic levels that are
the herbivorous species, the herbivorous species composition will define the
rest of the arthropod community. In sum, arthropod community is determined by
which plants can successfully grow in the environment to support herbivorous
insect species, which in turn, influence which predator species will be present
in the plant community as well. By focusing first on plant species composition,
certain arthropod communities can be better targeted for conservation,
management, or research.
Figure 2. Variations in ‘Vegetation Structure’ can be seen in
these pictures by the differing heights and densities of plant growth. (Picture from Shaffers 2008)
Though
Shaffers’ study did not look into the effects of urbanization upon arthropod communities,
his findings end up having implications for our own study concerning the
differences in ground beetle species between restored prairie sites and flowerbeds
across the Grinnell College campus. Plant species composition will undoubtedly
be very different between these two types of sample sites, with the resorted
prairie being a ‘naturally developing ecosystem’ while the flowerbeds,
aesthetically designed by landscapers, will not result in the same complex
plant community structure seen in prairie systems. Theoretically, ground beetle
assemblages will differ between the sites as a result of the differing plant
community compositions, which may have future implications concerning the
importance of flowerbed arrangements towards maintaining arthropod diversity and
abundance. If we are concerned about the decline in arthropod biodiversity,
even small-planted plots in urbanized areas can affect insect communities and their
conservation.
Reference: Schaffers AP, et al. 2008. Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology 89:782-794
It might be interesting to see in a larger scale experiment whether plant diversity has any other indirect effects on arthropod diversity. For example, maybe higher diversity of plants impacts the effect of birds or other predators on insect populations. Further, how do we know that we are not seeing "top down" trophic effects here? Maybe increasing insect diversity is what increases the plant diversity due to the insect predation on the plants.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting that soil PH and other environmental factors don't affect the insects in Schaffers' study directly, but I wonder if there are certain types of insects which are more sensitive to (more directly affected by) changes in soil nutrients, temperature, CO2 levels, etc. and whether this could make them more vulnerable to compositional changes in the soil brought about by intensive farming practices.
ReplyDeleteShaffers findings are interesting. I wonder how the results will compare with the chosen sites on campus since they are maintained through human intervention. I also wonder if larger numbers of certain plant groups such as legumes, forbs, or grasses correlate with arthropod diversity rather than a correlation with overall plant species composition.
ReplyDelete