Thursday, October 16, 2014

Why should we care about beetles and their response to the changing urban landscape?


            With increased urbanization comes increased disturbance of natural habitats for organisms around the globe. As skyscrapers, vast concrete surfaces, small green areas, and landscaped parks and gardens become more and more common, organisms have to find ways to survive in new and fragmented habitats. Many scientists have struggled with the difficult question of how urbanization will affect different and ecologically important species; however, it is difficult to generalize about the effects of urbanization. Therefore, it is important to understand this concept in a localized way since there are a variety of factors that come into play, including the scale of urbanization, the intensity, the geographic location, and the natural ecology of the area. Grinnell College’s campus, which is set in the middle of rural Iowa, is teeming with biodiversity. From butterflies to grasshoppers to vultures to native prairie plants, there is a lot to be studied. Grinnell College is a moderately urbanized area with lots of green space, landscaped gardens, as well as reconstructed prairie patches. Our research team was interested in understanding the local effects of urbanization on Grinnell’s campus.

            In Dr. Michael L. McKinney’s study, “Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals,” he dives into some complex questions about the effects of urbanization on species richness (or the number of different species) in different taxonomic groups (2008). In an attempt to answer these difficult questions, he reviews a total of 105 studies on plants, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates with low, moderate, and high levels of urbanization. While there is significant evidence in the literature for a consistent decrease in species richness with increased urbanization, there are some studies that show a surprising increase in species richness with intermediate levels of disturbance. In his review, McKinney interestingly found that the majority (65%) of the urbanization studies done on plants show an increase in species richness going from low to moderate levels of urbanization. However, this was not the case for vertebrates and invertebrates. Plants were the only taxa studied that showed a peak in species richness at moderate levels. All other taxa had species richness peaks in low urbanization settings. Additionally, there was no evidence for an increase in species richness going from moderate to high urbanization levels across all taxa. McKinney suggests here that human importation of non-native plants for landscaping purposes is the main reason for this trend in species richness this importation will outpace native species extinctions and lead to increased species richness at moderate levels of urbanization. This is not the case for other taxa; however, there are a lot of factors that affect an organism’s response to urbanization and it may differ widely on a species by species basis.

              

            Carabid beetles (ground beetles), the focus of our research, have been studied as a group of organisms that can be used as environmental bioindicators (Rainio et al. 2003). Bioindicators are species that can be observed in order to determine the effects of environmental disturbance in an area. Bioindicators often mirror the responses of other organisms as well as overall biodiversity. In order to try and understand how Grinnell’s Carabid beetle populations are responding to moderate levels of urbanization, we looked at the difference in species richness and diversity between restored prairie habitats on campus and landscaped garden habitats. While each of these habitats is fragmented, one is a remnant of the native Iowa landscape, and one is the result of human landscaping. It will be interesting to compare how ground beetles respond to these two different types of vegetation in a moderately urbanized setting. In accordance with McKinney’s findings, we predict that species diversity and abundance will probably decline in the landscaped areas, which simulate more urbanization, as opposed to the restored prairie, which simulates rural and native areas.
  


                                               (Reconstructed prairie at Grinnell College)


References:

McKinney, M.L. 2008. Effect of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems 11 (2): 161-176.

Rainio, J., Niemela, J. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 12 (3): 487-506.


3 comments:

  1. I agree with your prediction for your study. I actually wonder if a landscaped area really counts as a moderately urbanized area. Depending on how you define the term, a "moderately urbanized" environment could be an area in which a moderate proportion of the microhabitats have become urbanized. Choosing to sample in a landscaped area may not completely represent a moderately urbanized environment since the place you are sampling from is completely man-made. However, if you consider the impact of surrounding microhabitats, I see how you would get the same effect. Either way, I think you will find lower diversity in the landscaped area.

    ReplyDelete
  2. McKinney's paper is an important reminder that not all species respond the same to urbanization; some species may actually flourish in a human-dominated landscape. I find their result that plants demonstrate increased biodiversity in urban areas while insects and mammals have decreased biodiversity interesting. I am surprised that insect communities do not mimic plant communities. I would have expected that importation of plants by humans would have also increased insect richness as the increased plant richness would have increased the number of different feeding/nesting grounds for insects.

    Also, I am curious about why Carabid beetles are a good indicator species. Do they indicate just insect biodiversity or represent biodiversity of an urban area as a whole? McKinney's paper seems to warn against using one species as an indicator of biodiversity. What kind of conclusions about urbanization can we make from Carabid beetle populations. I think you'll find interesting information about how beetle biodiversity is impacted by imported plants versus native plants; McKinney's paper, though, warns that we shouldn't just assume that this information is reflective of all species.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Another possible study would be to see whether different species of ground beetles are affected by urbanization in similar ways or if they respond differently. If the richness of plant species is at a peak in moderate levels of urbanization, it is possible that one beetle species would prefer to live on or near a certain type of plant that does not occur as often in non-urbanized areas. If this is the case, then it would be interesting to see whether the beetles are affected by the changes in plant richness that occurs in urbanized areas.

    ReplyDelete