An individual’s dispersal ability greatly
affects its chances of success. Animals move when habitat proves unsuitable. Plants do not have this luxury and must
establish in a single location. Thus it follows that plants would be more
sensitive to microhabitats, or variation on a smaller spatial scale, and that
this would affect their spatial arrangement in a site. Such spatial
arrangements would also be sensitive to dispersal barriers, requiring plant
communities to develop another way to disperse offspring into suitable
microhabitats or tolerate a higher density of individuals within the currently
occupied space. The resulting separation between populations stems from a
larger issue of isolation. This has particular consequences for restoration
efforts within the urban setting because of the extreme fragmentation of
natural areas and the barriers created by manmade structures.
Recruitment from
established source populations often aids the succession of restoration and
reclamation projects. However, this
process requires source communities to be spatially close to the project to
work, a frequent limitation in urban settings where intervening buildings and
pavements hamper dispersion. Robinson and Handel (2000) experimented with
artificial habitat islands in an attempt to attract dispersal agents, namely
frugivore birds, to the region. By attracting dispersal agents, established
populations could overcome dispersion barriers and influence the spatial
patterning of the site, e.g. succession from bare ground to woodland. With a
total of 24 plots, they planted varying sized, native trees and shrubs in an
old, barren landfill in New Jersey, and kept track of the population over
several years. While they examined several aspects, they explicitly analyze the
effect of plant size, finding that larger plants had an initial advantage in plant
recruitment, but that this advantage diminished over time. While these results
suggest smaller starting plants would provide the best benefit for the cost of
restoration, they additionally note recruitment in seriously isolated urban
settings may never rise to the species diversity levels associated with
historic communities.
While my team’s
project does not look at a patch undergoing primary succession, we are looking
at the effect of microhabitat on dispersion, particularly of saplings.
Understanding source population influences and animal dispersal agents will
underscore the processes of secondary succession occurring in the site and will
inform the interpretation of its spatial patterning. Because we are in an urban
setting, we may have some of the issues of isolation. The adult trees in the
site may contribute the most to new individuals. However, nearby green spaces may act as additional source
populations. We focus on sapling abundance in relation to microhabitat
(overhead cover and slope steepness) in our study. If microhabitat works in
concert with dispersion to influence spatial patterning of saplings, this could
have implications for other human landscape management.
For the full
article by Robinson and Handel (2000):
Figure 2
(a) A diagram of the experimental study site of
Robinson and Handel (2000) shows the spatial pattern of plots. Each shaded box
represents one of the experimentally planted plots, whereas the open and dashed
boxes represent the plots that tested for the effects of fencing in attracting
birds. Open boxes have fencing but no intentional plantings, whereas dashed
boxes have no fencing or intentional plantings. (b) Shows an up close diagram
of planting patterns. The tilled strips were used to evaluate the dispersion of
species from the planting plots to outlying areas, but are not discussed in
this blog.
Do you guys have any ideas of what dispersal barriers may exist near your study sites, or if you think any dispersal agents are present for the species you are studying? It would be interesting to re-run the study again at a time when more dispersal agents are present, as it is a little cold for us to expect typical dispersal agents to be present now.
ReplyDeleteI'm curious about slope steepness on Grinnell's campus, given that Grinnell is notoriously flat. How do you plan to study the slope steepness? Do you think there is enough slope in Grinnell to effectively study slope steepness? Will slope steepness will yield significant results?
ReplyDelete